PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating the detection capabilities of nanopore sequencing for Borrelia burgdorferi detection in blacklegged ticks

JCJacob CassensEKEvan J. KippLFLexi E. Frank

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the effectiveness of nanopore adaptive sampling for detecting Borrelia burgdorferi in blacklegged ticks.
  • Performed PCR and nanopore adaptive sampling on individual ticks.
  • Conducted multiplexing across 168 ticks over seven sequencing experiments.
  • Analyzed detection metrics including sensitivity and specificity.
  • Nanopore adaptive sampling showed high specificity (0.97) for B. burgdorferi detection.
  • Demonstrated moderate sensitivity (0.48), with a noted risk of false negatives.
  • Quality-based filtering of sequencing data significantly affected detection metrics.

Abstract

Ticks pose substantial threats to public health. Blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis) are responsible for most tick-borne diseases in the US, transmitting seven human pathogens, including the etiological agent of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi. Molecular surveillance for tick-borne pathogens has been outpaced by their emergence, revealing a critical need to develop agnostic strategies that characterize expanding and reemerging pathogens. Oxford Nanopore Technology’s nanopore adaptive sampling (NAS), an approach that selectively enriches or depletes for target genomes or genetic loci, provides an opportunity to generate real-time genomic insights into tick-borne pathogens. In the current study, we performed PCR and NAS on individual Borrelia burgdorferi-infected and -uninfected ticks to evaluate the capability of NAS for tick-borne pathogen surveillance. We found that NAS generates real-time genetic datasets on B. burgdorferi that can supplement infectivity status ascertained via PCR. Using a multiplexing approach consisting of whole genomic DNA from 168 total ticks multiplexed over seven sequencing experiments, our results indicated that NAS is extremely specific (0.97 95% CI: 0.93, 1.00) with moderate sensitivity (0.48 95% CI: 0.41, 0.55), suggesting a strong capacity to confirm B. burgdorferi when present at the expense of an elevated false-negative rate. We found that quality-based filtering of sequence data has a substantial influence on detection metrics, emphasizing the need to optimize our multiplexing strategy, wet-lab procedures, and bioinformatic pipelines to enhance the sensitivity of NAS for detecting tick-borne pathogens.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cassens et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac4d02a1e69014ccdd67https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42373-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences2018 · 17,520 citations
  2. 2Clinical metagenomics2019 · 1,674 citations
  3. 3Clinical Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Detection2018 · 1,506 citations
  4. 4Estimating the Frequency of Lyme Disease Diagnoses, United States, 2010–20182021 · 624 citations
  5. 5Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k -mer weighting and repeat separation2017 · 8,297 citations