PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics0 citations

Investigating How Brain Stimulation Mitigates Motion Sickness Using Spatiotemporal Nystagmus Parameters Captured in VR

View Full Paper
GLGang LiMMMark McGillAGAlana Grant

Key Points

  • To explore how vestibular brain stimulation can reduce motion sickness through eye movement analysis.
  • Utilized sham-controlled eye-tracking data from a public database.
  • Employed a 20 Hz vestibular brain stimulation targeting the vestibular cortices.
  • Analyzed spatiotemporal eye movement metrics collected during virtual reality experiences.
  • Active brain stimulation decreased motion sickness and increased eye movement instability.
  • Increased instability was observed both temporarily and spatially compared to sham stimulation.
  • Temporal eye movement metrics were more closely associated with female participants, while spatial metrics were linked to male participants.

Abstract

Mitigating motion sickness with non-invasive cortical vestibular brain stimulation (vBS) is promising because it does not require redesigning VR content or altering the motion profile of a moving platform. Instead, it aims to enhance individuals' intrinsic resistance to motion sickness. However, the mechanism underlying its online efficacy remains unclear (Here, "online efficacy" means the observed motion sickness reduction during vBS not before or after vBS). Motivated by lower motion sickness susceptibility observed in congenital nystagmus patients, we hypothesized that reductions in motion sickness under vBS condition are associated with increased eye movement instability. Leveraging sham-controlled, sex-balanced eye-tracking data from an open-access database, this study presents the first evaluation of a 20 Hz-vBS approach targeting the vestibular cortices as a countermeasure to motion sickness, using spatiotemporal eye movement metrics derived from eye-tracking data collected in VR. Results show that reduced motion sickness under active vBS indeed increased eye movement instability temporarily and spatially, compared to sham vBS. We also found that the temporal metrics was more strongly associated with female participants, whereas the spatial metric was more strongly associated with male participants.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d892886c1944d70ce03e96https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2026.3680743
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation improves postural stability under virtual reality perturbation by enhancing vestibular processing and multisensory integration2026
  2. 208 | Exploring motion sickness reduction using incongruent vestibular and visual stimuli based on a computational model2025
  3. 3Enhancing HMD-VR user experiences with galvanic vestibular stimulation2026
  4. 4Exploring the Impact of Motion Parameter Variations in Virtual Reality Content on Visually Induced Motion Sickness: An Electroencephalography Signal Analysis Approach2024
  5. 5Evaluation of a Bone Conducted Vibration Device Designed for Motion Sickness Mitigation2025