PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Life1 citationsOpen Access

Diagnostic Yield in Childhood-Onset Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

STShahar TaiberRCRyan J. CarlsonNMNidal Muhanna

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine the effectiveness of genetic testing in diagnosing hearing loss in children.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing studies
  • Selected studies included over 50 families undergoing genetic testing
  • Meta-analysis used a random-effects model to assess diagnostic yield
  • Pooled diagnostic yield for bilateral hearing loss was approximately 47%
  • Yield for unilateral hearing loss was only about 5%
  • Diagnostic yield for bilateral cases outperformed other conditions like epilepsy

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the diagnostic yield of whole-exome and targeted-panel sequencing in children with hearing loss. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies describing cohorts of >50 families undergoing whole exome or targeted panel sequencing. Studies were excluded if they pre-screened for common deafness genes without including the data in final analyses, focused on syndromic hearing loss, or lacked diagnostic yield information. Meta-analysis employed a random-effects model of single proportions to determine yield across included studies. The pooled diagnostic yield for bilateral hearing loss was ~47%, while unilateral cases demonstrated a yield of only ~5% across both testing methods. These findings demonstrate that the diagnostic yield for bilateral hearing loss exceeds that of other conditions frequently requiring clinical genetic testing, such as epilepsy and intellectual disability, though this advantage does not extend to unilateral hearing loss. These results have important implications for healthcare policy decisions regarding genetic testing guidelines and funding.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Taiber et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893896c1944d70ce047dfhttps://doi.org/10.3390/life16040610
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper