PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Systematic Reviews0 citationsOpen Access

Predictive performance of artificial intelligence algorithms for gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
YLYingni LiangMLMeiyan LuoJSJiayu Shen

Key Points

  • The study aims to systematically review the predictive performance of AI algorithms for gestational diabetes mellitus.
  • Conduct a systematic literature search across six major databases.
  • Independently screen titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for relevant studies.
  • Summarize qualitative data on study characteristics and methodological quality.
  • Perform random-effects meta-analysis or meta-regression for predictive performance data from multiple studies.
  • AI algorithms showed higher accuracy for predicting gestational diabetes compared to traditional models.
  • A comprehensive appraisal of AI models' predictive performance is necessary to determine their clinical utility.

Abstract

Background Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication that can pose numerous adverse health effects on both mothers and newborns. Accurate prediction of the risk of GDM serves as a valuable supplement to prenatal education and clinical decision-making. Compared with traditional prediction models, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have demonstrated higher predictive accuracy and stronger individualization capabilities. However, the application of AI models in GDM prediction is still in a developmental stage, and their performance and clinical utility have not been thoroughly evaluated. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review and critically appraise the published predictive performance of AI models for GDM prediction and to offer insights for future research and practical application. Methods A systematic literature search will be performed across six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, and OVID). Screening of titles and abstracts, full-text review, and data extraction will be independently completed by two authors. Qualitative data on the characteristics of the included studies, methodological quality, and the applicability of models will be summarized through narrative descriptions and tabulated formats. For models with predictive performance data from multiple studies, a random-effects meta-analysis or meta-regression will be employed to synthesize the findings, considering potential heterogeneity. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is deemed not applicable for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The findings will be based on published literature, disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and presented at major conferences focused on clinical healthcare. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number CRD42025645913

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893eb6c1944d70ce04d8ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03167-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper