PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering1 citations

Toward Sustainable Paper Manufacturing: An Interpretable Data-Driven Strategy for Energy-Efficient Drying

View Full Paper
XCXiaobin ChenYCYe ChenHLHuaying Luo

Key Points

  • The research aims to enhance the energy efficiency of the paper drying process using machine learning techniques.
  • Employs four machine learning algorithms: Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, CatBoost, and Stacking.
  • Utilizes SHAP method for model interpretability.
  • Tackles regression and classification problems related to steam flow and energy efficiency states.
  • CatBoost achieves R2 of 0.874 for steam flow prediction and 96.46% accuracy in energy efficiency classification.
  • Stacking algorithm shows R2 of 0.873 for steam flow and 96.38% accuracy in classification.
  • Average energy consumption reduction of 2.93% across samples, with 39% showing reductions exceeding 3%.

Abstract

The papermaking process is typically energy-intensive, with high carbon emissions, facing significant pressure for energy conservation and emission reduction. The paper drying process is the most energy-consuming stage in the papermaking process, and improving its energy efficiency is crucial for achieving energy-saving and emission-reduction effects in the papermaking industry. To address these challenges, four machine learning algorithms─Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, CatBoost, and Stacking─are employed to tackle the regression problem of predicting steam flow and the classification problem of multilevel energy efficiency states in the drying section. Additionally, the SHAP method is utilized to enhance the interpretability of machine learning models. The results demonstrate that machine learning models achieve an excellent predictive performance. Specifically, the CatBoost algorithm establishes robust accuracy in both steam flow prediction (R2 = 0.874) and energy efficiency classification (accuracy = 0.9646). Meanwhile, the Stacking algorithm also shows superior performance in both steam flow prediction (R2 = 0.873) and energy efficiency classification (accuracy = 0.9638). More importantly, through SHAP-based feature optimization on low energy efficiency samples, significant energy savings are achieved: every sample achieved an energy consumption reduction of at least 2.4%, with 39% of the samples showing energy consumption reductions exceeding 3%, with an average energy consumption reduction of 2.93% across all samples. SHAP analysis further identifies key operational parameters including winding car speed, end section inlet air flow, front section inlet air flow, basic weight, and steam pressure as critical factors for energy optimization. This data-driven, interpretable machine learning approach not only effectively predicts energy efficiency in paper drying processes but also provides substantial energy-saving potential, offering valuable insights for paper companies to optimize operations and advance the industry’s green transformation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894ec6c1944d70ce05cf1https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c12893
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper