PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026American Journal of Health Promotion0 citations

Use of a Process Map to Evaluate the Implementation of a Community-Clinical Linked Pediatric Asthma Intervention

View Full Paper
KPKali PereiraJAJohn AlmeidaGRGrace W. Ryan

Key Points

  • The central aim is to evaluate the implementation of a community-clinical linked asthma intervention using a process map.
  • Developed a process map following the CDC Logic Model.
  • Trained community partners and pediatric providers on the intervention steps.
  • Collected adherence measures through surveys and tracking data.
  • Analyzed data using descriptive and frequency statistics.
  • All pediatric practices and schools completed training (100%, n=48).
  • Medication orders were received within 6 weeks despite initial delays.
  • Children attended the school health office for 92% of scheduled medication days.
  • High satisfaction with communication was reported, but challenges persisted between providers and school health staff.

Abstract

PurposeTo use a process map to evaluate implementation of a community-clinical linked asthma intervention.DesignFollowing the CDC Logic Model, we created a process map that outlined: (1) training community partners, (2) pediatric providers enrolling children and prescribing a second preventive inhaler, (3) families delivering the inhaler to school, (4) children visiting the school health office for daily supervised inhaler administration, and (5) ongoing communication.SettingThe trial which the present data comes from was conducted within 4 pediatric primary care practices.SampleThe study sample included pediatric providers/staff (n = 14), children (n = 31), parents (n = 31), and school health staff (n = 18).MeasuresAdherence measures were defined for each process step, using surveys and tracking data.AnalysisDescriptive and frequency statistics were calculated.ResultsAll recruited pediatric practices (n = 2) and schools (n = 46) completed training (100%, n = 48). Although delays occurred in sending medication orders from practice staff to schools, all orders were received within 6 weeks of enrollment. Children attended school health offices 92% of scheduled medication days. Providers and families reported high satisfaction with communication, though challenges existed between providers and school health staff.ConclusionUsing a process map, we were able to evaluate adherence to intended process steps and inform future adaptations to improve implementation. Process maps can be practical tools for guiding implementation evaluations and intervention adaptations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pereira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8955f6c1944d70ce065bbhttps://doi.org/10.1177/08901171261441085
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trends in US Pediatric Asthma Hospitalizations, by Race and Ethnicity, 2012–20202024 · 30 citations
  2. 2Physicians’ accounts of frontline tensions when implementing pilot projects to improve primary care2018 · 8 citations
  3. 3CENTER-IT: a novel methodology for adapting multi-level interventions using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research—a case example of a school-supervised asthma intervention2022 · 28 citations
  4. 4School-supervised use of a once-daily inhaled corticosteroid regimen: A cluster randomized trial2018 · 18 citations
  5. 5School-based supervised therapy programs to improve asthma outcomes: current perspectives2018 · 20 citations