PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026The Journal of Chemical Physics0 citations

Node transfer for multi-fidelity and multimodal machine learning for predicting experimental bandgaps

View Full Paper
SLShuai LiWYWen-Cheng YaoBXBin-Bin Xie

Key Points

  • The research aims to improve the accuracy of predicting experimental bandgaps using machine learning.
  • Developed a machine learning framework utilizing multi-fidelity and multimodal models.
  • Integrated data from first-principle calculations and x-ray diffraction spectra.
  • Proposed a new node transfer strategy for information fusion.
  • Compared node transfer with the Δ-learning strategy across various benchmarks.
  • Node transfer consistently outperformed Δ-learning in all tested models.
  • Achieved a mean absolute error of 0.258 eV, a reduction of 26.3% from the baseline of 0.350 eV.
  • The model requires only the chemical composition of crystals as input, simplifying materials design.

Abstract

Bandgap is a key property of materials. In recent years, machine learning has become a powerful tool to predict the experimental bandgaps of compounds before synthesis, but there is still much room for improving the prediction accuracy. Here, we build a machine learning framework that consists of multi-fidelity and multimodal learning models to integrate heterogeneous data sources obtained from first-principle calculations and x-ray diffraction spectra. A new information-fusion strategy named node transfer is proposed. Compared to the widely used Δ-learning strategy, it naturally extends two-fidelity to multi-fidelity learning and facilitates heterogeneous multimodal integration. Node transfer consistently outperforms Δ-learning across two-fidelity, multi-fidelity, and multimodal benchmarks under fine-tuning. The best model involves XRD-based descriptors and encoded descriptors pre-trained based on four computational datasets using different functionals. It achieves a mean absolute error of 0.258 eV, a 26.3% reduction vs the single-fidelity baseline of 0.350 eV. In all prediction tasks, only the chemical composition of the crystal is required as input for the constructed machine learning models, which is free of structural information and, therefore, applicable to materials design before experiments or first-principle calculations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895a86c1944d70ce06aeehttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0320627
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper