PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology0 citationsOpen Access

Cytomegalovirus retinitis in diverse immunocompromised populations: clinical presentation, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors

View Full Paper
STSeyed Ali TabatabaeiAMArash MirzaeiKDKimia Daneshvar

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the clinical presentations and visual prognosis of CMVR in HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals.
  • Retrospective cohort study of 117 eyes from 91 patients treated for CMVR.
  • Patients were categorized into HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups based on the cause of immunosuppression.
  • Data on demographic, clinical presentations, and visual outcomes were collected and analyzed.
  • HIV-negative patients had more severe vitritis than HIV-positive patients (34.8% vs 19.7%; p = 0.009).
  • HIV-positive patients had worse baseline visual acuity compared to HIV-negative patients (mean 1.85 vs 1.31 logMAR; p = 0.045).
  • Long-term visual outcomes were similar across both groups despite clinical differences.
  • Baseline BCVA and retinal detachment were identified as independent predictors of final visual acuity.

Abstract

Background: Cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) is a vision-threatening retinal infection that primarily affects severely immunocompromised individuals. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical presentations, long-term visual outcomes, and predictors of visual prognosis in CMVR patients across different immunodeficiency subtypes. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: This study analyzed 117 eyes from 91 patients with CMVR who were treated at a tertiary eye center between 2009 and 2024. Eyes were stratified by the underlying cause of immunosuppression into a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive group (71 eyes of 58 patients) and an HIV-negative group (46 eyes of 33 patients). The HIV-negative group included patients with hematologic malignancies, drug-induced immunosuppression (e.g., posttransplant or autoimmune therapy), solid organ transplantation, autoimmune disease, congenital immunodeficiency, and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2). Patient demographics and comprehensive ophthalmologic examination findings were recorded and compared across these subgroups. Results: The study included 91 patients (117 eyes) with a mean age of 40.1 ± 14.7 years; 62.6% were male. Of these, 58 patients (71 eyes) were HIV-positive (mean age 39.7 ± 10.9 years; 65.5% male) and 33 patients (46 eyes) were HIV-negative. Among HIV-negative patients, 19 eyes were in patients with hematologic malignancies (mean age 35.3 ± 21.1 years; 75% male), 20 eyes were in patients with drug-induced immunosuppression (mean age 38.6 ± 17.9 years; 40% male), and the remainder eyes were associated with solid organ transplant, autoimmune disease, congenital immunodeficiency, or poorly controlled DM (7 eyes). Eyes in HIV-negative patients exhibited more severe vitritis than those in HIV-positive patients (34.8% vs 19.7% with vitritis grade +2; p = 0.009). Conversely, HIV-positive patients presented with worse baseline visual acuity (mean 1.85 ± 1.14 logMAR vs 1.31 ± 1.17 logMAR; p = 0.045). Comparing the two main HIV-negative subgroups, the drug-induced immunosuppression group showed a significantly higher incidence of retinal vascular sheathing (30% vs 0% of eyes; p = 0.009), whereas the hematologic malignancy group demonstrated more cotton-wool spots (21.1% vs 0% of eyes; p = 0.030). Despite these phenotypic differences, long-term visual outcomes were similar across all groups. On multivariable regression, baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (β = 0.527, p < 0.001) and retinal detachment (β = 0.254, p = 0.017) were independent predictors of poorer final visual acuity. Conclusion: CMV retinitis demonstrates distinct clinical phenotypes in different immunosuppressed populations. HIV-negative patients tend to show more pronounced vitritis and vasculopathic retinal features, whereas HIV-positive patients have worse baseline visual acuity. However, the long-term visual prognosis was not significantly influenced by the underlying cause of immunosuppression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tabatabaei et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895a86c1944d70ce06baehttps://doi.org/10.1177/25158414261440308
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper