PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Journal of Burn Care & Research0 citationsOpen Access

C-852-02. Demographic and Clinical Predictors of Skin Graft Loss in Burn Injuries: A National Database Study

View Full Paper
MKMare G KaulakisCPCamilo PérezHLHilary Y Liu

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify demographic and clinical predictors associated with skin graft loss in burn patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of the Burn Care Quality Platform from 2013 to 2022
  • Analysis of demographics, burn characteristics, comorbidities, and hospitalization outcomes
  • Statistical analysis using paired t-tests, chi-squared tests, and multivariable logistic regression
  • Of 286,478 burn patients, 8.4% received a skin graft and 2.0% experienced graft loss
  • Independent predictors of graft loss included age, alcohol use, drug use, and neurologic impairment
  • Patients with graft loss had longer ICU stays, more operations, and higher in-hospital mortality

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Skin grafting is often performed in patients with full or partial-thickness burns. However, skin graft loss remains a significant complication3. This study aims to identify demographic and clinical predictors associated with receiving a skin graft and experiencing graft loss. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Burn Care Quality Platform (BCQP) from 2013 to 2022. Demographics, burn characteristics, comorbidities, and hospitalization outcomes were analyzed using paired t-tests, chi-squared tests, and multivariable logistic regression models. Results Of 286 478 burn patients, 24 046 (8.4%) received a skin graft, and 472 (2.0%) of those experienced graft loss. Patients who underwent skin grafting were likely to be older (39.3 vs.36.8, p.001), male (68.2% vs. 66.0%, p.001), have a greater TBSA (10.7% vs. 7.3%, p.001), and have full-thickness injuries (91.5% vs. 79.6%, p.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed independent predictors included increasing age (OR = 1.007, p.001), alcohol use (OR 1.55, p.001), drug use (OR 1.85, p.001), and neurologic impairment (OR 5.46, p.001). Obesity (OR 0.76), diabetes (OR 0.87), and heart failure (OR 0.54) were associated with lower odds (p.001). Among patients who received skin grafts, those with graft loss were older (46.4 vs. 39.2, p.001) and had greater TBSA burns (23.7% vs. 10.5%, p.001). Graft loss was associated with more ICU days (25.8 vs. 7.2, p.001), more operations (4.7 vs. 1.8, p.001), higher in-hospital mortality (5.1% vs. 2.4%), and greater likelihood of discharge to another facility (43.8% vs. 13.6%). Multivariable logistic regression showed independent predictors of graft loss included alcohol use (OR = 2.02, p.001), drug use (OR = 1.26, p=.034), obesity (OR = 1.51, p.001), diabetes (OR = 1.30, p=.001), hypertension (OR = 1.27, p=.001), and neurologic impairment (OR = 1.68, p=.031). Larger TBSA (OR = 1.02), trunk burns (OR = 2.33), and lower extremity burns (OR = 2.21) were associated with increased risk (p.001). Conclusions Early recognition of these factors may help inform preventative strategies, perioperative planning, and postoperative care to improve patient outcomes and reduce graft failure rates. Applicability of Research to Practice Highlighting key risk factors for graft loss can inform perioperative planning, patient counseling, and postoperative care. Incorporating risk stratification into routine practice may help optimize resource use and reduce graft failure rates. Funding for the study N/A.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaulakis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895be6c1944d70ce06dd2https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag033.062
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper