PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Journal of Burn Care & Research0 citationsOpen Access

Classification Systems & Clinical Outcomes of Axillary Burn Contracture: A Systematic Review & Meta-analysis

View Full Paper
MKMare G KaulakisGFGina M FrigicAYAaron J Yeh

Key Points

  • This review aims to compare outcomes of different surgical techniques for axillary burn contractures and evaluate classification system usage.
  • Conducted a systematic review of literature on surgical approaches for axillary burn contractures.
  • Searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for eligible studies.
  • Analyzed 64 studies with a total of 1823 patients, focusing on various surgical techniques and classification systems.
  • Local flap techniques were associated with better functional outcomes and lower recurrence rates than skin grafting.
  • Kurtzman and Stern's classification was the most commonly used among the few formal classification systems.
  • Variable reporting and inconsistent classifications hindered detailed subgroup analyses.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Axillary burn contracture is a common and debilitating complication of burn injuries, impairing mobility and quality of life. Multiple classification systems and treatments exist, but the optimal choice remains controversial as there is limited systematic data comparing outcomes across techniques and classifications. Methods A systematic review was performed on surgical management of post-burn axillary contractures. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies that include full-text original articles with 3 human patients. Data were extracted and quality assessed independently by two reviewers with disputes settled by a third. Outcomes were synthesized qualitatively and, where feasible, meta-analyzed with subgroup analyses by contracture type. Results Of 1196 articles screened, 64 met inclusion, encompassing 1823 patients with axillary burn contracture. Most were case series, with few comparative designs. Formal classification systems were rarely applied; when used, Kurtzman and Stern was most common. Reported surgical approaches included skin grafting (n = 327), scapular flaps (n = 117), and square flaps (n = 76), with additional series describing other local, regional, and free flap techniques. Variable reporting and inconsistent classification use limited detailed subgroup analysis. Conclusions Local flap techniques appear to provide favorable outcomes in axillary burn contractures, with lower recurrence and better functional preservation reported in several studies compared to skin grafting. However, inconsistent use of classification systems and variable outcome reporting limit direct comparisons across studies. Standardized reporting of contracture type and surgical outcomes is needed to guide evidence-based selection of reconstructive techniques. These findings suggest that flap-based reconstructions may be advantageous, particularly for more severe contractures, though further high-quality studies are needed. Applicability of Research to Practice This study addresses different surgical approaches for post-burn axillary contractures. The findings help clarify whether current surgical patterns align with best outcomes and inform evidence-based recommendations for managing these cases. Funding for the study No external funding was received for this review. The review is supported by the guarantor/review team’s (non-commercial) institutional affiliations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaulakis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d896166c1944d70ce0758ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag033.540
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper