PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Objectives of Economic Policy: The Economy of Belonging

View Full Paper
CDCarlos Federico Obregon Diaz

Key Points

  • The goal is to outline the objectives of economic policy grounded in the Economy of Belonging framework.
  • Develops an integrated theory of economic policy objectives.
  • Identifies five core objectives: growth, stability, distribution of income, capabilities, and belonging.
  • Introduces a coordination model to analyze institutional arrangements and equilibria.
  • Redefines economic growth as productive belonging to markets.
  • Reconceptualizes stability as a confidence equilibrium.
  • Integrates income and capabilities as essential for cooperation rather than residual.
  • Elevates belonging as the ultimate goal of economic policy.

Abstract

This paper develops an integrated theory of the objectives of economic policy within the framework of the Economy of Belonging (EB). It argues that economic policy cannot be reduced to technical macroeconomic optimization, since macroeconomic performance and development fundamentally depend on institutional arrangements that determine equilibrium selection and define conditions of social inclusion. The article identifies five core objectives of economic policy: (1) economic growth, (2) economic and financial stability, (3) income distribution, (4) distribution of capabilities, and (5) satisfaction of belonging. These objectives are shown to be structurally interdependent dimensions of a single problem: the construction of a sustainable cooperative equilibrium grounded in institutional credibility, social cohesion, and positive expectations. The paper introduces several original contributions. First, it redefines growth as productive belonging to broad and technologically demanding markets. Second, it reconceptualizes stability as a confidence equilibrium, where crises arise from rational expectations of institutional failure rather than from behavioral irrationality. Third, it integrates income and capability distribution as structural conditions for cooperation, rather than as residual social policies. Fourth, it elevates belonging—understood as recognition, inclusion, and effective access—to the ultimate objective of economic policy. A minimal formalization is provided through a coordination model with multiple equilibria (cooperation vs. coercion), where institutional strength determines equilibrium feasibility. The framework is extended to the global level, proposing that international stability depends on institutionalized interdependence, rule-based trade, and the expansion of a global middle class. This work contributes to a post-neoclassical synthesis integrating growth theory, institutional economics, and political economy under a unified ontological and analytical framework.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d896166c1944d70ce075c5https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19471490
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper