PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Radioelectronics and Communications Systems0 citations

Parameters of Ribbon Electron Beam Formed by HVGD Guns: Study of Focal Parameters

IMI. V. MelnykSTS. B. TuhaiOKO. M. Kovalenko

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine the electric field distribution and focal parameters of electron beams formed by HVGD guns.
  • Calculated electric field distribution and electron beam trajectories using analytical expressions.
  • Employed sequential upper relaxation, current tube, and Runge-Kutta methods for simulation.
  • Utilized extreme analysis numerical methods and arithmetic-logical expressions for simplification.
  • Expressed iterative relations as recurrence matrices for programming efficiency.
  • The relative difference between calculated and experimental thickness of the electron beam in focus is within 15-20%.
  • Successful calculation of electron trajectories in free drift region in anode plasma.
  • Provided crucial insights for engineering development of electron beam technology.

Abstract

In the second part of the article, the electric field distribution, electron beam trajectories, and their focal parameters are calculated using the known analytical expressions to determine the plasma boundary position relative to the cathode surface. The sequential upper relaxation method, the current tube method, the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method, and extreme analysis numerical methods are used to determine the electric field distribution in the electrode system, to calculate the spatial charge, to calculate the electron trajectories in the free drift region in the anode plasma, and to estimate the thickness of the electron beam in focus, respectively. The iterative calculation relations for the electric field distribution and electron beam trajectories are expressed as arithmetic-logical expressions and recurrence matrices to simplify program code implementation. The obtained relative difference between calculated and experimental data for the thickness of the electron beam in focus doesn’t exceed 15–20%. The theoretical and experimental results obtained are important for further engineering development of electron beam technological equipment intended for industrial use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Melnyk et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2a99e4eeef8a2a6afa43https://doi.org/10.3103/s0735272724040010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper