PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Tsinghua Science & Technology1 citationsOpen Access

MOOC Dropout Prediction with Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JTJorge Tenorio-BerrioJPJorge Pérez‐MartínELEmilio Letón

Key Points

  • The aim is to synthesize the performance of machine learning techniques for predicting dropouts in MOOCs.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines
  • Used a random-effects model for a quantitative analysis of dropout predictions
  • Analyzed sensitivity and specificity as key performance metrics
  • Performed subgroup analysis to understand factors affecting model performance
  • Machine learning systems can accurately identify a significant portion of potential dropouts
  • Performance varies based on dataset and dropout definitions used in studies
  • High heterogeneity in results suggests cautious interpretation of findings

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have gained popularity as an accessible form of education, attracting a diverse and widespread student base. Despite their potential, MOOCs face a significant challenge: high dropout rates, which undermine their effectiveness and impact. The increasing interest in addressing this problem led to numerous studies developing new models to predict dropouts early and automatically, many of which use Machine Learning (ML) approaches. This research performs a quantitative synthesis of the performance of ML techniques for early dropout prediction in MOOCs. Following PRISMA guidelines, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. To analyze the overall performance, we use a random-effects model for a meta-analysis of proportions, analyzing two metrics: sensitivity and specificity. We have also studied the relationship between some of the studies’ characteristics and the performance obtained by means of subgroup analysis. The results indicate that ML systems are capable of accurately detecting a significant percentage of potential dropouts. However, the performance of these systems varies depending on the dataset and the definition of dropout used in each study. Despite the promising findings, the high heterogeneity observed across studies suggests that these results should be interpreted with caution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tenorio-Berrio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2b04e4eeef8a2a6afefchttps://doi.org/10.26599/tst.2025.9010039
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper