PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Biology Bulletin Reviews0 citations

Host Defensive Responses and Nutritional Ecology of Six Insect Pests on Sesame

NRNayan RoyNCNeha ChowdhuryBSBratatee Sardar

Key Points

  • To explore how host plant defensive responses influence the nutritional ecology and population growth of six insect pests on sesame.
  • Insect pests were reared on herbivore damaged, mechanically damaged, and intact sesame plants over two years.
  • Chemical profiles of sesame were analyzed based on plant damage status.
  • Statistical analyses assessed variations in nutritional ecology and pest population growth.
  • Host defensive responses significantly altered the nutritional ecology of the insect pests.
  • The chemical profile of sesame showed significant differences among damaged and intact plants.
  • Population growth patterns of the pests were influenced by the plant damage type, with notable variations.

Abstract

Host plant defensive responses towards herbivory were derived from a long run-in evolutionary arm race and their phenotypic plasticity increase fitness against the herbivores. Six insect pests (Diacrisia casignetum, Spilosoma obliqua, Spodoptera litura, Spilarctia lutea, Helicoverpa armigera and Plutella xylostella) were reared on respective herbivore damaged plants (HDP), mechanically damaged plants (MDP) and intact plants (IP) of sesame (Sesamum indicum, cv. Rama) during 2021–2023. The nutritional ecology and population growth of the selected pest species were significantly (F5.12 = 9.451; P S. obliqua > H. armigera > S. lutea > S. litura > D. casignetum) > MDP > IP. The Pf were in almost in same pattern (H. armigera > D. casignetum > S. obliqua > P. xylostella > S. litura > S. lutea) on the three conditions (HDP < MDP < IP) as in GRR or mx. The overall population growth displayed different patterns of significance (F5.12 ≥ 4.215; P ≤ 0.019) and were in the same order (HDP < MDP < IP) as in nutritional ecology due to different biotic potential of the pests as well as herbivore specific host defensive responses. The findings inform about the specific elevation of both PMs and SMs in respective HDPs of sesame from MDPs and IPs and their impact on ecology of the insects and that can be useful to exploit the pests as a part of integrated pest management (IPM) in near future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2b04e4eeef8a2a6b009dhttps://doi.org/10.1134/s2079086425601255
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A mechanistic framework integrating morphological, physiological, and redox-mediated defenses underlying sesame resistance to <i>Antigastra catalaunalis</i> (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)2026
  2. 2Population growth performance and antioxidant enzymes activities of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on diets from various sesame cultivars.2025
  3. 3EVALUATION OF COMPARATIVE RESISTANCE IN ELITE SESAME GERMPLASM AGAINST ITS INSECT PEST COMPLEX2025
  4. 4Morphological Parameters of Sesame in Relation to Susceptibility to Major Sucking Insect Pests2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Response of Certain Sesame Cultivars to the Infestation of Antigastra catalaunalis (Duponchel) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Under Field Condition and Two Irrigation Systems2024