This study investigates the feasibility of acoustic signal analysis for the assessment of weld bead quality in the shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) process. The work focuses on comparing time-domain acoustic signals and time–frequency spectrogram representations for the classification of welds as accepted or rejected according to standard welding inspection criteria. Two key acoustic descriptors, the fundamental frequency (F0) and the harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), were extracted and analyzed to evaluate statistical differences between the two weld quality classes. Statistical tests, including Anderson–Darling, Levene, ANOVA, and Kruskal–Wallis (α = 0.05), revealed significant differences between accepted and rejected welds. Accepted welds exhibited a bimodal HNR distribution associated with transient arc instability at the beginning and end of the bead, whereas rejected welds showed more uniform acoustic behavior throughout the process. Subsequently, the acoustic data were represented using both audio signals and spectrograms and used as inputs for ten supervised machine learning models, including Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Logistic Regression (LR), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Extra Trees (ET), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Naïve Bayes (NB). The results demonstrate that spectrogram-based representations significantly outperform time-domain signals, achieving accuracies of 0.95–0.96, ROC-AUC values above 0.95, and false positive and false negative rates below 6%. These findings indicate that, while scalar acoustic descriptors provide statistically significant insight into weld quality, time–frequency representations combined with machine learning enable a more robust and reliable framework for automated non-destructive evaluation, particularly in manual SMAW processes under realistic operating conditions.
Rodríguez et al. (2026) studied this question.