PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice0 citations

Use of mirtazapine for appetite stimulation and weight gain in cancer-associated cachexia and anorexia: A systematic review

View Full Paper
KEKourtney A EllenbergHVHannah K VitaleMBMichael P Bloomfield

Key Points

  • This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of mirtazapine for appetite stimulation and weight gain in cancer-associated cachexia and anorexia.
  • Systematic review of five randomized controlled trials
  • Data sources included PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL
  • Studies compared mirtazapine to placebo, megestrol acetate, and olanzapine.
  • Mirtazapine improved appetite significantly compared to olanzapine, but not to placebo or megestrol acetate.
  • Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in weight or energy intake between mirtazapine and controls.
  • Adverse effects were similar across mirtazapine and comparator arms.

Abstract

ObjectiveLimited guidance is available for the treatment of anorexia/cachexia in cancer patients. Appetite stimulation and weight gain are documented side effects of mirtazapine, so there is growing interest in its potential use this patient population. The objective of this review is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mirtazapine for appetite stimulation and weight gain in cancer-associated cachexia/anorexia (CACS).Data sourcesA literature search was performed in December 2025 using PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL to screen for randomized controlled trials meeting the designated inclusion and exclusion criteria.Data summaryFive randomized controlled trials were reviewed. Two studies compared mirtazapine to placebo, two compared mirtazapine to megestrol acetate, and one compared mirtazapine to olanzapine. Overall risk of bias was low for two studies, with some concerns identified in three studies. While mirtazapine demonstrated significant improvement in appetite from baseline in most studies, it was only when compared to olanzapine that mirtazapine significantly improved appetite compared to a control. Conversely, one study demonstrated superiority of megestrol, and the remaining three studies did not identify a difference in appetite outcomes between mirtazapine and the control group. Secondary outcomes analyzed included weight and energy intake, though no significant differences were noted between mirtazapine and the control group in any study. Rates of adverse effects were similar between mirtazapine and all comparator arms.ConclusionsThe included studies did not demonstrate consistent improvement in appetite outcomes with use of mirtazapine, although use was associated with low risk of harm. More trials involving larger patient populations and longer study durations may be warranted to establish its role in CACS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ellenberg et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7eb0bfa21ec5bbf06e4ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/10781552261445609
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Phase II Trial of Mirtazapine for Cancer-Related Cachexia and Anorexia2009 · 122 citations
  2. 2Efficacy and Tolerability of Generic Mirtazapine (Mirtax) for Major Depressive Disorder: Multicenter, Open-label, Uncontrolled, Prospective Study2015 · 11 citations
  3. 3Comparison of Effectivity and Safety of Olanzapine and Mirtazapine on Cancer-Associated Anorexia and Cachexia in Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer Patients: Prospective, Comparative, Interventional Study2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4Mirtazapine versus megestrol acetate in treatment of anorexia-cachexia in advanced cancer patients: a randomized, double-blind trial2024 · 12 citations