PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2020International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health69 citationsOpen Access

Increasing Incidence of Liposarcoma: A Population-Based Study of National Surveillance Databases, 2001–2016

View Full Paper
SBSuzanne BockDHDouglas G. HoffmannYJYi Jiang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

= 37,499). Both sources of data showed males accounting for ~60% of the cases; 82%-86% cases were identified among whites. Age-adjusted incidence was greater among males vs. females and whites vs. blacks, whereas survival did not differ by sex and race. The dedifferentiated (57.2%), pleomorphic (64.1%), and retroperitoneal (63.9%) tumors had the worse survival. Nationwide, liposarcoma rates increased by 19%, with the annual percent increase (APC) of 1.43% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.74). The APC was greater for males vs. females (1.67% vs. 0.89%) and retroperitoneal vs. extremity tumors (1.94% vs. 0.58%). Thus, incidence increased faster in the high-risk subgroup (males), and for retroperitoneal tumors, the low-survival subtype. The SEER generally over-estimated the rates and time trends compared to nationwide data but under-estimated time trends for retroperitoneal tumors. The time trends suggest an interaction between genetic and non-genetic modifiable risk factors may play a role in the etiology of this malignancy. Differences between SEER and CNCPR findings emphasize the need for nationwide cancer surveillance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bock et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fffd78e92f4a033c853bb7https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082710
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper