Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
A Monte Carlo study compared 14 methods to test the statistical significance of the intervening variable effect. An intervening variable (mediator) transmits the effect of an independent variable to a dependent variable. The commonly used R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986) approach has low statistical power. Two methods based on the distribution of the product and 2 difference-in-coefficients methods have the most accurate Type I error rates and greatest statistical power except in 1 important case in which Type I error rates are too high. The best balance of Type I error and statistical power across all cases is the test of the joint significance of the two effects comprising the intervening variable effect.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
MacKinnon et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7b81f1f14cb2b27b8a8a2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
David P. MacKinnon
Chondra M. Lockwood
Jeanne M. Hoffman
Psychological Methods
Arizona State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...