What is the clinical evidence from this study?

Study design: Review. Population: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD).

April 29, 2026

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Social Feed

Authors

Sharonne N. Hayes

Marysia S. Tweet

David Adlam

Journals

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Actions

Institutions

University of British Columbia

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Hayes et al. (Sat,) conducted a review in Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is an important cause of myocardial infarction in younger women, but significant uncertainty remains regarding its optimal diagnosis and management.

www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f275c522c12685b2434890 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.084

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15-49: United States, 2017-2019.· 2020 · 476 citations
Management of Pregnancy in Patients With Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association· 2017 · 449 citations
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection· 2017 · 594 citations
Recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection in the United States· 2019 · 21 citations
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Patients With a Provisional Diagnosis of Takotsubo Syndrome

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Social Feed

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Also consider