This study investigates the effectiveness of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model in fostering students’ learning independence and mathematical creative thinking skills. The research was conducted with seventh-grade students at SMP Negeri 2 Mesuji, Lampung, during the odd semester of the 2024/2025 academic year. The population comprised 216 students across seven classes, from which two classes were selected using cluster random sampling. A pretest–posttest control group design was employed. Data were collected through essay tests on the topic of social arithmetic and questionnaires assessing students’ learning independence. The data were analyzed using t-tests, N-Gain analysis, and one-proportion z-tests. The results indicate that the PBL model was more effective than conventional learning in enhancing both mathematical creative thinking and learning independence. The experimental group achieved a significantly higher average N-Gain score than the control group. Furthermore, over 60% of students in the experimental class attained a “good” category in learning independence after the intervention. Improvements in creative thinking indicators—fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration—were also more pronounced in the PBL group. These findings demonstrate that Problem-Based Learning not only improves students’ cognitive abilities but also cultivates essential learning dispositions such as independence and creativity. This research provides empirical support for the integration of student-centered learning models in mathematics education to promote higher-order thinking skills.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Aziza Khairu Rokhis
Maximus Gorky Sembiring
Endang Wahyuningrum
Bulletin of Science Education
Indonesia Open University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rokhis et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb3d552b87ece8dc955e3c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.51278/bse.v5i2.1807
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: