Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
China's Anti-Monopoly Law currently fails to adequately cover the circumscribed regulation of self-preferential behavior on digital platforms. There are controversies in the academic circle about the definition of the illegality of digital platform self-preference. The purpose of this paper is to provide an institutional supply for the regulation of self-preference on digital platforms and to construct a localized system of self-preference on digital platforms through empirical research and comparative law study. Through the idea of "clear entry into the law - entry into the expansion - justified exemption", it defines, judges the illegality and regulates the self-preferential behavior of digital platforms, and explores the concise analysis path of anti-competitive behavior of digital platforms. It also explores the concise analysis path of anti-competitive behavior of digital platforms.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shining Liu (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e684a3b6db64358760dc80 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v3n1.24
Shining Liu
International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
Southwest University of Political Science & Law
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: