Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The TEAD transcription factors in association with the YAP/TAZ co-activators drive the expression of pro-proliferative and pro-oncogenic genes that underlies the transformed phenotype of many carcinomas. In addition, YAP-TEAD transcriptional activity is emerging as a major resistance mechanism for diverse precision oncology drugs, with the most extensive data for resistance to drugs targeting the MAPK pathway. There is a strong interest in generating inhibitors of YAP/TEAD transcriptional activity with TEAD palmitic acid site inhibitors having demonstrated encouraging pre-clinical activity and now clinical activity with confirmed objective responses with the TEAD1/2/3 inhibitor VT3989. However, the TEAD1-preferential inhibitor IK930 did not yield any objective responses but also showed a more favorable safety profile especially with respect to proteinuria. These contrasting clinical read-outs provide a good lead-in to a critical design challenge/question of TEAD palmitic acid site inhibitors: the optimization of inhibitory profile against the respective four TEAD paralogs (TEAD1-4). In depth bioinformatic analyses led Sporos investigators to conclude that while TEAD1 inhibition was a minimum requirement for anti-neoplastic activity, inhibition of other paralogs would be necessary for maximizing biological impact and a TEAD1/4 inhibitor would provide the best balance of anti-neoplastic activity and toxicity. Activity against TEAD2 was identified as counter-productive associated with a context-specific paradoxical stimulation of cell proliferation and tumor growth while activity against TEAD3 was flagged as a major driver of podocyte effacement and kidney toxicity. Here, we provide novel corroborating data supporting this selection of inhibitory profile. We provide an update on the pre-clinical efficacy and toxicology of SPR1, Sporos’s TEAD1/4 preferential inhibitor which favorably contrasts with other TEAD inhibitors such as the TEAD1/3/4 inhibitor VT3989 and the TEAD1 inhibitor VT103 and IK930 in both the monotherapy and combination setting. We show that 1) SPR1 displays broader and deeper cell-based activity and extends the utility of TEAD inhibitors outside of mesothelioma and NF2 mutants 2) SPR1 shows stronger activity than TEAD1-only inhibitors in combination with MAPK and EGFR inhibitors in vitro and in vivo 3) SPR1 does not cause proteinuria in mice; dogs or rats even above therapeutic doses 4) SPR1 does not show the context-specific stimulation of tumor growth in Lung PDX previously observed with VT3989 and other inhibitors that include TEAD2 in their profile. Taken together - the data suggests SPR1 is positioned to become a best-in-class TEAD palmitic acid site inhibitor with broad utility in both monotherapy and combination setting. Citation Format: Florian Muller, Selvi Kunnimalaiyaan, Parth Mangrolia, Jill Olson. TEAD1/4 inhibitors exhibit deeper biological impact and broader activity compared to TEAD1-only inhibitors in both monotherapy and combination without additional kidney toxicity abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts) ; 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84 (6Suppl): Abstract nr 5913.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Florian L. Müller
Selvi Kunnimalaiyaan
Parth Mangrolia
Cancer Research
BioVentures (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Müller et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e72babb6db6435876a5ade — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-5913
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: