Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial (IA) administration of low- dose tirofiban during endovascular therapy in patients with large ischemic core volumes on initial brain CT. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of IA tirofiban. We identified 87 patients (16 and 71 patients in the tirofiban and no-tirofiban groups, respectively) with acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial artery occlusion who underwent endovascular therapy with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT scores (2-5). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed no association between IA tirofiban administration and serious postprocedural hemorrhagic complications (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.720; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.099-5.219; p = 0.960), any radiologic hemorrhage (aOR 0.076; 95% CI 0.003-2.323; p = 0.139), or 3-month mortality (aOR, 0.087; 95% CI 0.005-1.501; p = 0.093). However, IA tirofiban was associated with a lower 90-day mRS score (aOR, 0.197; 95% CI 0.015-1.306; p = 0.017) and change of NIHSS compared with baseline (aOR, 0.698; 95% CI 0.531-0.917; p = 0.010). IA tirofiban administration during endovascular therapy in patients with large ischemic core volumes may be effective and safe.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kwang‐Chun Cho
Nak‐Hoon Son
So Hyeon Gwon
Scientific Reports
Yonsei University
Keimyung University
Severance Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cho et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7a413b6db64358770c3d2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53715-8
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: