Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) serve as the standard first-line therapy for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the sustained clinical benefits achieved through optimal EGFR-TKI treatments, including the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib, resistance inevitably develops. Currently, there are no targeted therapeutic options available postprogression on osimertinib. Here, we assessed the preclinical efficacy of BI-4732, a novel fourth-generation EGFR-TKI, using patient-derived preclinical models reflecting various clinical scenarios. Experimental Design: The antitumor activity of BI-4732 was evaluated using Ba/F3 cells and patient-derived cell/organoid/xenograft models with diverse EGFR mutations. Intracranial antitumor activity of BI-4732 was evaluated in a brain-metastasis mouse model. Results: We demonstrated the remarkable antitumor efficacy of BI-4732 as a single agent in various patient-derived models with EGFRC797S-mediated osimertinib resistance. Moreover, BI-4732 exhibited activity comparable to osimertinib in inhibiting EGFR-activating (E19del and L858R) and T790M mutations. In a combination treatment strategy with osimertinib, BI-4732 exhibited a synergistic effect at significantly lower concentrations than those used in monotherapy. Importantly, BI-4732 displayed potent antitumor activity in an intracranial model, with low efflux at the blood–brain barrier. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the potential of BI-4732, a selective EGFR-TKI with high blood–brain barrier penetration, targeting a broad range of EGFR mutations, including C797S, warranting clinical development.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eun Ji Lee
Seung Yeon Oh
You Won Lee
Clinical Cancer Research
Yonsei University
Boehringer Ingelheim (Austria)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lee et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7b3d4b6db64358770db1f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2951
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: