Energy efficiency retrofits are central to climate policy, yet their implications for indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and occupant health remain underexplored. This study investigates IEQ outcomes following staged retrofits in Irish social housing, where achieving Building Energy Rating (BER) targets is the primary performance metric. Four dwellings, three retrofitted and one control, were monitored over six weeks during the heating season. Built in the 1980s, these homes represent the typical social and private housing stock of that era. Continuous measurements of carbon dioxide, temperature, relative humidity, and thermal performance were complemented by analyses of vapour pressure excess and ventilation rates. While all retrofitted homes achieved BER improvement targets, persistent IEQ challenges were identified. Elevated pollutant concentrations and increased condensation/mould risk occurred in the presence of inadequate ventilation. Thermal anomalies and cold bridging were associated with cavity wall insulation, whereas external wall insulation provided more stable surface temperatures and reduced moisture-related risks. These results underscore the complex interplay between retrofit measures, occupancy patterns, and ventilation performance. The study highlights the need for retrofit strategies that integrate energy efficiency with occupant health objectives. At scale, retrofit programmes risk embedding systemic vulnerabilities unless ventilation and moisture control are prioritised, with implications that extend to health, wellbeing, and long-term building resilience.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Seamus Harrington
Mark Mulville
Buildings
Technological University Dublin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Harrington et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698586388f7c464f2300a2fc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16030652
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: