Remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) typically rely on over-actuated propulsion systems to achieve precise dynamic positioning and maneuvering in complex underwater environments. In practice, however, conventional propulsion management based on thrust allocation is often challenged by non-ideal actuator behaviors, such as cavitation-induced thrust degradation, low-speed dead-zone effects, inter-thruster coupling, and partial actuator failures. Most existing approaches treat propulsion management as a static force distribution problem and implicitly assume ideal or fast thrust execution, which limits performance when actuator dynamics and execution uncertainty become significant. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a control-oriented thruster management framework that reformulates propulsion management as a feedback regulation problem rather than a static allocation task. In the proposed framework, actuator dynamics and thrust execution uncertainty are explicitly incorporated into the control loop. At the actuator level, thrust degradation and low-speed operation are compensated through disturbance-aware feedback control, while at the system level an LQI-based controller with thrust response compensation is employed to coordinate multi-degree-of-freedom (DOF) force and moment regulation and suppress cross-axis coupling. Fault tolerance is achieved inherently through feedback regulation without relying on explicit fault detection or reallocation. Experimental results obtained from an ROV propulsion platform, including single-thruster tests, coupled multi-DOF control, and a thruster shutdown scenario, demonstrate improved thrust executability, reduced coupling-induced disturbances, and enhanced fault-tolerant performance compared with conventional direct thrust allocation strategies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Linlin Wang
Yinyin Wu
Chao Fang
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
University of Science and Technology of China
Hefei University of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699010ce2ccff479cfe56fac — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14040352
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: