Introduction Blood pressure control is critical in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy. Fluctuations in blood pressure can compromise cerebral reperfusion and influence 90-day functional prognosis. However, the relationship between blood pressure and prognosis remains unclear. Objective To examine the impact of blood pressure control strategies on 90-day functional prognosis, intracranial hemorrhage, mortality, and neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke following thrombectomy. Method We systematically searched major Chinese/English databases up to April 2025 for interventional studies on post-thrombectomy blood pressure management in acute ischemic stroke. Dual-reviewer screening with predefined criteria identified eligible studies. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool assessed methodological quality. Data extraction and random-effects meta-analysis (RevMan 5.1) evaluated pooled risk ratios (95% confidence intervals), with heterogeneity quantified via I 2 statistics. Results This meta-analysis of 12 studies ( n = 4,794) found no significant benefit of intensive over standard blood pressure lowering in functional recovery, hemorrhagic risk, mortality, or early neurological outcomes post-thrombectomy. However, subgroup analyses revealed critical associations: lower systolic blood pressure correlated with functional independence (−4.46 mmHg), while elevated levels were linked to intracranial hemorrhage (+6.55 mmHg) and mortality (+3.12 mmHg). Conclusion The meta-analysis findings suggest that individualized blood pressure thresholds, rather than uniform intensive control, may optimize postintervention outcomes, warranting further prospective validation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jie Chen
Ying Gao
Wei Zhang
SAGE Open Nursing
Capital Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chen et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7ffecb39a600b3ee3ca — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608261420469