Abstract Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy are standard for the first-line (1L) treatment of estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2−) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC). Although CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ER+/HER2− ABC, resistance ultimately occurs. For patients who develop resistance to CDK4/6i-based therapy, there is no universal standard of care, highlighting a key unmet need for this patient population. PF-07248144 is a novel, oral, selective inhibitor of KAT6A and KAT6B, two histone lysine acetyltransferases that regulate lineage-specific gene transcription via H3K23 acetylation. Vepdegestrant (ARV-471/PF-07850327) is an oral PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) ER degrader that has exhibited clinical activity as monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with ER+/HER2− ABC. Here, we describe a phase 1/2 study that aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the KAT6 inhibitor, PF-07248144, in combination with vepdegestrant in patients with ER+/HER2− ABC (NCT04606446). Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 study of PF-07248144 as monotherapy or in combination for patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including breast cancer. The study is comprised of two parts: dose escalation (Part 1) and dose expansion (Part 2). Parts 1E and 2E are focused herein and are evaluating PF-07248144 plus vepdegestrant in patients with ER+/HER2− ABC. Patients are eligible to participate in Parts 1E and 2E if they are ≥18 years of age (or per local regulatory requirements) and have histologically or cytologically confirmed ER+/HER2− ABC. Other eligibility criteria include disease progression after ≥1 prior line of treatment with CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy. Patients may have received fulvestrant. Other inclusion criteria are measurable disease as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1, adequate organ function, asymptomatic/stable brain metastasis and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Females must meet postmenopausal criteria, and premenopausal women with ovarian suppression (via chemical menopause) are allowed. Key exclusion criteria are prior malignancies within 3 years of enrollment; prior major surgery, radiation therapy, or systemic anticancer therapy within 3 weeks of study entry; major ECG abnormalities or cardiac disorders; symptomatic brain metastasis or visceral metastasis; active infection; active inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases or conditions; and pregnancy or breastfeeding. The recommended dose for expansion for PF-07248144 plus vepdegestrant will be determined in Part 1E and evaluated in Part 2E. Primary endpoints are dose-limiting toxicities (Part 1E only), safety, and tolerability. Secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetics of PF-07248144 and vepdegestrant in both Parts 1E and 2E, and best overall response, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, time to progression, and overall survival in Part 2E. Citation Format: F. Yan, T. Mukohara, Y. Park, S. Im, G. Kim, T. Yamashita, D. Sommerhalder, R. Layman, E. Hamilton, S. Kim, F. Hara, S. Wang, J. Chien, J. Kim, T. Clay, R. Joshi, Y. Chae, C. Oakman, B. Holbrook, B. Dong, Y. Cheng, H. Li, J. Yang, S. Kent, L. Liu, K. Kowalski, S. Badhrinarayanan, A. Skoura, L. Howie, P. Lorusso. A phase 1/2 trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the KAT6 inhibitor, PF-07248144, in combination with vepdegestrant in patients with ER+/HER2− locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-09-30.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
F. Yan
Shu Yazaki
Y. H. Park
Clinical Cancer Research
Yale University
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Peking University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yan et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8efecb39a600b3f02bc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-09-30
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: