Abstract Background: The current threshold for estrogen receptor (ER) positivity in breast cancer (BC) is ≥1% of positively stained cancer cells by immunohistochemistry. However, tumors with ER-low expression (ER 1-9%) share biological features with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), including gene-expression profiles, immune features, and response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The clinical benefit of endocrine treatment (ET) in this subgroup of patients remains uncertain. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched Ovid MEDLINE and Embase (last updated February 2, 2025) for randomized trials and observational studies including patients with non-metastatic ER-positive (≥1%)/HER2-negative BC, presenting estimates of ET efficacy or effectiveness within the ER-low subgroup, or enabling outcome comparisons between ER-low and ER≥10% tumors. Manual citation screening was also performed to identify additional eligible studies. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to derive pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for overall (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) in the two ER strata, and to assess the association between ET use and outcomes within the ER-low group. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. Egger’s test was used to evaluate publication bias. Sensitivity analyses included leave-one-out and exclusion of reconstructed data or surrogate endpoints. Results: Of 8,982 records screened, 17 studies were included, comprising 9,711 patients with ER-low tumors and 58,660 with ER≥10% tumors. In pooled analyses, patients with ER-low tumors had worse DFS (HR 2.18 95% CI: 1.58-3.00; I2 = 78%) and OS (HR 2.08 95% CI: 1.30-3.31; I2 = 96%) compared to those with ER≥10% tumors. Among patients with ER-low tumors, receipt of endocrine therapy was associated with improved DFS (HR 0.74 95% CI: 0.55-1.00; I2 = 25%) and OS (HR 0.80 95% CI: 0.70-0.92; I2 = 21%). No significant publication bias was detected by Egger’s test. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings. Conclusions: Our systematic review and metanalysis showed that patients with ER-low breast cancer experience a significantly worse prognosis compared to those with ER10%, and derive a survival benefit from ET. These results suggest that, in addition to therapeutic strategies appropriate for such high-risk profile - such as chemotherapy - the potential benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapy should not be overlooked and ought to be part of the clinical discussion for patients with early-stage ER-low tumors. Citation Format: D. Massa, E. Chiappe, V. Delucchi, F. Girardi, E. Blondeaux, M. La Commare, V. Guarneri, M. Lambertini, M. Dieci. Impact of Endocrine Therapy in Estrogen Receptor-Low Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-07-19.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Davide Massa
Edoardo Chiappe
Virginia Delucchi
Clinical Cancer Research
University of Padua
University of Genoa
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Massa et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9dae482488d673cd3b8e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-07-19
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: