Incorporating additional clinical, laboratory, and imaging predictors improves stroke risk stratification beyond the CHA2DS2-VA score in NVAF patients with a score of 1, aiding personalized anticoagulation decisions.
Does the assessment of additional clinical, laboratory, and imaging predictors improve stroke risk stratification and anticoagulation decision-making in NVAF patients with a CHA2DS2-VA score of 1?
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and a CHA2DS2-VA score of 1
Assessment of additional clinical, laboratory, and imaging stroke risk predictors beyond the CHA2DS2-VA score
Stroke risk prediction and decision-making for anticoagulation
Expert consensus suggests that incorporating additional clinical, laboratory, and imaging risk factors beyond the CHA2DS2-VA score can improve stroke risk stratification and guide anticoagulation decisions in NVAF patients with a score of 1.
Background/Objectives: Comorbidity and risk factor management and avoiding stroke are pillars of optimal atrial fibrillation management. In this article, the latest literature on additional stroke risk factors not included in the CHA2DS2-VA score is reviewed in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The possible clinical impacts of the additional risk factors in NVAF patients with a CHA2DS2-VA score of 1 are compiled with insights in an interdisciplinary panel discussion to refine daily clinical practice. Methods: The panel was composed of three cardiologists, one endocrinologist, and a nephrologist. The panel members finalized twenty open-ended questions covering major problems in stroke risk stratification in NVAF patients with a score of 1. The shortcomings of this clinical-based model for stroke prevention and its possible outcomes were discussed with evidence-based recommendations. The meeting outcomes are addressed for daily clinical adaptation in the present article. Results: Recent evidence suggests that the CHA2DS2-VA score may have shortcomings in a striking rate of NVAF patients with a score of 1. The growing body of evidence suggests that combining clinical, laboratory, and imaging predictors with the CHA2DS2-VA score may further refine stroke risk prediction and aid in decision-making for anticoagulation of NVAF patients with a score of 1. Conclusions: The interdisciplinary expert panel offered several recommendations based on the assessment of additional risk factors, which may enable clinicians to identify individualized patient characteristics and early multidisciplinary prevention of disease progression and personalized improvements in the long-term cardiovascular outcomes in NVAF patients with a CHA2DS2-VA score of 1.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ersin Çağrı Şimşek
Sena Sert Sekerci
Murat Gücün
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
Istanbul Medipol University
Izmir University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Şimşek et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and CHA2DS2-VA score of 1. Incorporation of additional clinical, laboratory, and imaging risk factors to refine stroke risk prediction and aid in anticoagulation decision-making vs. CHA2DS2-VA scoring alone was evaluated on Stroke or systemic embolism risk prediction improvement with additional risk factor assessment beyond CHA2DS2-VA score. Incorporating additional clinical, laboratory, and imaging predictors improves stroke risk stratification beyond the CHA2DS2-VA score in NVAF patients with a score of 1, aiding personalized anticoagulation decisions.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a287a00a974eb0d3c037a7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051758
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: