What if dark energy, wave function collapse, and dark matter are not three independent cosmological puzzles — but three temporal roles in a single irreversible process? This paper turns that idea into a testable framework. It derives a minimal analytic DE→DM coupling (one free parameter, xi0) that generates a concrete late-time w (z) morphology and observational targets relevant to DESI DR2 and the Euclid era. In the paper you’ll find: • A closed-form baseline: wₑff (z) = −1 + xi0 S (z) (analytic solution + activation kernel) • A clean falsifiability condition in the minimal realization: wₑff ≥ −1 (no physical phantom field required) • Survey-facing targets: w (z) curvature across the activation window, growth/lensing priorities (next step: CLASS/CAMB perturbations), and potential environment-dependent signatures linked to archival density Canonical DOI (latest, all versions): https: //doi. org/10. 5281/zenodo. 15779210 The Cosmology of Time (CT) framework proposes that the dark sector emerges from the thermodynamic cost of the universe's irreversible quantum-to-classical transition. Dark energy is the engine that continuously generates genuinely open quantum possibilities and erases every alternative not selected — two inseparable thermodynamic costs of the same irreversible cycle, the second grounded in the Landauer principle. Wave function collapse is the irreversible selection — the process by which quantum possibilities become classical facts. Dark matter is the cumulative gravitational archive of past selections — not a passive record but an active causal rail that progressively constrains where and how the next cycle of collapses will unfold. The archive only grows. Erased branches do not return. This is the cosmological arrow of time. The cosmic acceleration at z ≈ 0. 7 is interpreted as the thermodynamic phase transition at which the rate of possibility generation overcame the gravitational weight of the accumulated archive. The current proportions — 70% DE, 25% DM, 5% baryons — are the thermodynamic snapshot of this ongoing process. This is version 2 of the foundational CT paper, fully revised after peer review. It derives analytic solutions for a minimal baryon-mediated DE→DM coupling with a single free parameter (ξ₀), demonstrates Planck consistency, and produces an effective equation of state wₑff (z) = −1 + ξ₀ S (z) whose morphology is set entirely by the development of the gravitational rail — not by a scalar field potential. Dark matter is decomposed into a primordial seed component and a late-time archive generated by the irreversible cycle. The framework is structurally constrained to w ≥ −1, providing an explicit falsifiability condition against phantom crossing. Dimensional analysis links the Landauer identification to the Gibbons–Hawking horizon temperature, showing quantitative consistency between the erasure bit-rate and the cosmological horizon entropy density. New in v2: cosmological temperature scale and Landauer bit-rate budget (§6. 2), outline of perturbation-level equations (§9. 2), clarified epistemic status of foundational postulates, and elevated falsifiability conditions. Testable predictions for DESI DR2, Euclid, Roman, and Rubin are provided, including environment-dependent assembly bias, characteristic sigmoid curvature of w (z) near the activation redshift, and weak-lensing signatures in diffuse systems. The model reduces to ΛCDM when ξ₀ → 0. cosmology, dark energy, quantum information, wave function collapse, DESI DR2, Euclid, Landauer principle, decoherence, interacting dark energy, equation of state, dark sector coupling, arrow of time, quantum-to-classical transition, Cosmology of Time, gravitational archive, causal rail, thermodynamic cosmology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Everton Behenck (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52e15f1e85e5c73bf16a7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18809963
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Everton Behenck
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...