The behavior of shield tunnel lining structures is known to be influenced by segmental joints. Most studies conducted in this area use simplified models, which may not properly simulate the behavior of the segmental joints. This study utilizes a full-reinforced concrete segment model to rigorously investigate the seismic behavior of joints in a segmental tunnel lining, explicitly accounting for segment–segment contact, interaction, and joint bolts. Specifically, a comprehensive full dynamic analysis of a two-dimensional (2D) lining–soil model, incorporating nonlinear constitutive models for both concrete (CDPM) and soil (Mohr–Coulomb), was conducted to investigate the effects of joint bolt type, seismic intensity, and vertical excitation component on the seismic response. The lining–soil model was excited using three ground motions. The results indicate that the joint rotation is significantly influenced by the amplitude and frequency content of ground motions, which has implications for the watertightness of the gasketed joint. In particular, including the vertical component of the excitations was found to increase the diametral deformation by at least 150% and tended to increase other structural responses. Moreover, the bolt tension increased significantly by over 400% with only a 150% increase in seismic intensity, highlighting the strong nonlinear sensitivity. However, due to the inherent constraints of the 2D plane-strain assumption, the influence of the bolt type remains inconclusive.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bismark Kofi Meisuh
Jin-Hee Ahn
Kiseok Kwak
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Infrastructures
Chonnam National University
Gyeongsang National University
Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Meisuh et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75b3ec6e9836116a2238c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11020042
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: