Addressing climate change depends on large-scale system changes, which require public advocacy. Here, we identified and tested 17 expert-crowdsourced theory-informed behavioral interventions designed to promote public, political, and financial advocacy in a large quota-matched sample of US residents (n = 31,324). The most consistently effective intervention emphasized both the collective efficacy and emotional benefits of climate action, increasing advocacy by up to 10 percentage points. This was also the top intervention among participants identifying as Democrats. Appealing to binding moral foundations, such as purity and sanctity, was also among the most effective interventions, showing positive effects even among participants identifying as Republicans. These findings provide critical insights to policymakers and practitioners aiming to galvanize the public behind collective action and advocacy on climate change with affordable and scalable interventions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Danielle Goldwert
Sara M Constantino
Yash Patel
PNAS Nexus
Stanford University
Columbia University
University of California, San Diego
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Goldwert et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75b7ec6e9836116a22e80 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf400
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: