While all fetal growth references showed comparable predictive ability for adverse perinatal outcomes, they differed substantially in sensitivity and FPR. When the top priority is to identify as many at-risk fetuses as possible, Lindström et al.'s reference seems to be the best choice. However, when the top priority is a balanced sensitivity versus FPR, the WHO reference seems most suitable for clinical practice in this population of term births.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Linda Lindström
Fredrik Ahlsson
Ove Axelsson
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Karolinska Institutet
Uppsala University
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lindström et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75bb5c6e9836116a2387e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70136