ABSTRACT Introduction Chamois ( Rupicapra spp.) are widely distributed across Europe and parts of Asia (ten subspecies). Studies on their distribution and habitat selection account for less than 10% of the literature on the genus, and existing research disproportionately focuses on the Alpine chamois ( R. r. rupicapra ). Aims We explored the chamois home range patterns and habitat selection drivers, trends in methodological data collection and analysis tools, and research gaps. Methods We conducted a systematic search (PRISMA guideline) and a meta‐analysis of the peer‐reviewed, English‐language articles that reported quantitative data on home range size or habitat selection, comprising 22 studies spanning 16 study areas. Results and Discussion Knowledge stemmed mainly (68% of studies) from the Alpine subspecies. Seven subspecies remain understudied (0–1 study each). Telemetry and field observations were the primary field methods in home range and habitat selection studies, respectively. Annual individual home ranges were small but varied greatly (0.04–4.94 km 2 ), depending on sex (larger in males), dispersal behaviour (larger in migrating males) and season. Habitat selection analysis (24 factors tested; 452 cases) revealed that topography (elevation, slope, escape terrain) and human disturbance (hunting, infrastructure, hiking trails, livestock) influenced chamois habitat selection. Rocky, grassland and forest habitat use were season‐dependent, and snow‐covered areas were generally avoided. Recommendations We highlight the need for further research on underrepresented and threatened subspecies, as well as on the chamois' responses to human disturbance and climatic variables, to better inform conservation management under global change.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Κωνσταντίνος Παπακώστας
Roberta Chirichella
Marco Apollonio
Mammal Review
University of Ioannina
University of Sassari
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Παπακώστας et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75bbec6e9836116a23a4f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.70023