Skin cancer represents an escalating global public health challenge where early detection is paramount, potentially increasing five-year survival rates to 99%. While dermoscopy improves diagnostic sensitivity, its effectiveness often depends on clinician experience and is subject to inter-observer variability. To address these limitations, this study presents a rigorous comparative analysis of four state-of-the-art Vision Transformer (ViT) architectures, DeiT III-Base, Swin-Base, ViT-Base, and PiT-B, for the automated classification of pigmented skin lesions. We utilized the HAM10000 dataset (n=10,011) and implemented a stratified 70-15-15 split to ensure balanced training, validation, and testing phases. Images were resized to 224×224 pixels and normalized using ImageNet parameters, while transfer learning was employed to stabilize training and enhance generalization. Experimental results indicate that DeiT III-Base achieved superior diagnostic efficacy, reaching an accuracy of 92.04% and an F1-score of 85.44%. Furthermore, computational evaluation revealed that DeiT III-Base and ViT-Base offered highly efficient clinical throughput with sub-millisecond inference times (0.5674 ms and 0.5459 ms, respectively), whereas PiT-B exhibited the lowest computational workload (21.1067 GFLOPs). These findings underscore the viability of attention-based paradigms as robust real-time Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) tools. Future research will explore the integration of multi-modal patient data and Explainable AI (XAI) to foster transparency and clinical trust.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Md Saiful Islam
André Chéagé Chamgoué
Gurvinder Pal Dubb
Computers and electronics in medicine.
Deakin University
University of Ngaoundéré
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Islam et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75bdbc6e9836116a23ed5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.69882/adba.cem.2026015
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: