ABSTRACT This paper proposes a multiple unmanned aerial vehicle (multi‐UAV) formation obstacle avoidance strategy based on the dynamic vector velocity obstacle (DVVO) method, aiming to address the design challenges of the VO method in three‐dimensional (3D) dynamic space applications. By considering the relative position and velocity between the UAV and obstacle, a dynamic avoidance plane (DA‐Plane) is constructed, which can accurately reflect the collision risk of UAVs in 3D space. On this basis, a dynamic vector velocity obstacle space is designed, and the optimal constant critical escape velocity is selected outside this space to accomplish the obstacle avoidance task, thereby ensuring the smoothness of the flight process. Subsequently, this paper extends the DVVO method to multi‐UAV formation based on fuzzy control and the virtual spring algorithm, and designs a differentiated obstacle avoidance strategy to ensure the safe operation of multi‐UAV formation in dynamic environments. Simulation and real‐world experiments demonstrate that the proposed method enables multi‐UAV formation to effectively avoid dynamic obstacles in 3D space and reach the target in a desired formation shape. Compared to the citation algorithm, the DVVO method shows superior performance in terms of smooth motion and computational efficiency. This study effectively simplifies the complex obstacle avoidance problems of multi‐UAV formation in 3D dynamic environments, demonstrating significant potential for applications.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yimei Chen
Shichang Wei
Baoquan Li
Journal of Field Robotics
Tiangong University
Air Force Engineering University
Wuhan Ship Development & Design Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chen et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75becc6e9836116a24244 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.70169
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: