As AI and robots infiltrate our workplaces, many of us can’t help but wonder - what will this mean for us humans? We sought to understand if emotional intelligence - that uniquely human capacity to perceive, make sense of, and regulate emotions - remains valuable amid increasing human-AI collaboration. And do our attitudes toward these technologies influence how we experience wellbeing at work? To investigate, we surveyed 257 professionals across diverse industries. Some already worked hand-in-hand with AI systems or robotic colleagues daily, while others had not yet entered that frontier. Using validated assessments, we measured emotional intelligence, attitudes toward AI/robots, and overall workplace well-being. The findings contained fascinating revelations. Contrary to fears that AI will dehumanize work, employees collaborating with these technologies reported higher wellbeing compared to non-collaborators. Rather than diminishing the human experience, introducing AI and robots may be enhancing it by providing opportunities for learning, growth and skills enrichment. Moreover, emotional intelligence emerged as a powerful asset for maintaining wellbeing - whether you collaborated with machines or not. However, attitudes mattered too. For those lower in emotional intelligence, having more positive attitudes toward working alongside AI/robots was linked to greater overall workplace well-being. These findings contribute to the growing body of literature on human-AI interaction in the workplace by providing a theoretical basis for understanding how individual differences in emotional capabilities and technology attitudes shape experiences in AI/robot-augmented work environments.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bohdan Rożnowski
Klaudia Matłacz
Piotr Mamcarz
International Journal of Social Robotics
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
Instytut Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rożnowski et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75f9ec6e9836116a2b1f9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-025-01342-2