The article gives an overview of the state of research on the topic of appropriation of Jewish property during the Holocaust in a broad European perspective. Starting with the developments in the German historiography, the article emphasises that nowadays ‘Aryanisation’ is seen less as an act of ruling than as a ‘social practice’. This notion rests on vast local studies concerning different cities in the German Reich. When looking at robbing processes outside the Reich, in occupied territories, a learning process can be seen, as it was not possible to apply the practices from the Reich in other countries and societies. The main difference in the occupation practices between Western and Eastern Europe, finally, was that in Western Europe the robbing still happened under pseudo-legal forms, while in the Eastern European occupation areas the practices of robbery were much more affected by violence and personal enrichment of the German occupiers.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sanela Schmid
Christian Schölzel
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schmid et al. (Mon,) studied this question.