This article focuses on the multidimensional role of the pronoun ‘we’ in discourse, extending far beyond its traditional classification as a substitutive grammatical unit. In present-day linguistic analysis, pronouns are increasingly recognized as significant communicative, cognitive, pragmatic, and discursive elements that actively shape communicative interactions. The use of ‘we’ not only reflects interpersonal dynamics between the speaker and the listener but also conveys implicit information about their identity, inclusion, and positioning within a given context. Central to this study is the concept of we-discourse, a macro-discursive phenomenon in which ‘we’ operates as a key marker and organizing principle. We-discourse constitutes a communicative and mental space where strategies of inclusion, solidarity, authority, and opposition are enacted. This discourse type manifests across a wide range of text genres – political speeches, advertising, news media, and virtual communication – each shaped by specific communicative intentions and sociocultural contexts. The investigation draws attention to the following roles of ‘we’: how it constructs shared meaning, reinforces commonality or collectivity, and guides the pragmatic framework of discourse. Based on the authentic textual examples analyzed, the article highlights the semantic and functional versatility of ‘we’ and illustrates how its usage promotes coherence, impact, and persuasive power of discourse. Ultimately, the analysis positions ‘we’ not merely as a linguistic placeholder, but as a central, dynamic force in the architecture of communication and the construction of collective identity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Olena Gryshchenko
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Olena Gryshchenko (Wed,) studied this question.