Technological lock-in has been a standard explanation for the slow take-off of clean innovation, but is hard to reconcile with forward-looking investors who anticipate the eventual switch to clean technologies. We provide an alternative explanation: strategic investment complementarities shape innovation and self-fulfilling prophecies can lead to delayed low-carbon transition. We analyze a standard directed technical change model with clean and dirty inputs. We find that when the two are good substitutes, two stable steady states can co-exist, each allowing multiple transitional paths. Optimal low-carbon transition requires a Pigouvian tax rule combined with a coordination device; commitment to a Pigouvian tax trajectory cannot solve a coordination failure
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
J.A. Smulders
Sophie Zhou
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Smulders et al. (Tue,) studied this question.