March 3, 2026Open Access

Reconsidering Venous Grafts for Bile Duct Replacement: Caution in Interpretation and a Prospective Path Forward

Key Points

Caution is needed when interpreting outcomes related to venous grafts for bile duct replacement, due to ethical concerns.
Data supporting the findings is available upon request, considering privacy and ethical restrictions.
Observational analysis reveals that graft quality may influence long-term success; further scrutiny is essential.
Evaluation methods may vary, but a standardized approach can enhance understanding and application in clinical settings.

Abstract

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Authors

Mehdi Boubaddi

Chetana Lim

Olivier Scatton

Journals

World Journal of Surgery

Actions

Institutions

Inserm

Sorbonne Université

Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Reconsidering Venous Grafts for Bile Duct Replacement: Caution in Interpretation and a Prospective Path Forward

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study