Background: Accurate vertebral instance segmentation on full-spine radiographs is essential for spinal parameter assessment, but supervised methods require costly instance-level annotations and may be sensitive to domain shift. Methods: We investigated whether promptable segmentation foundation models can generalize zero-shot to raw DICOM spine radiographs without task-specific training. We evaluated SAM-ViT-Huge, SAM2-Hiera-Large, and MedSAM-ViT-Base on 144 full-spine radiographs with 1309 annotated vertebral masks using a standardized pipeline for DICOM decoding, intensity normalization, automatic prompt generation, and instance-level evaluation. For each prompt, models produced three candidate masks. Performance was reported under an oracle protocol selecting the candidate with the highest IoU against ground truth and a model-score protocol selecting the candidate with the highest predicted IoU. Metrics included IoU, Dice, precision, recall, ASSD, and HD95. Results: The best configuration was SAM-ViT-Huge with rectangle prompting, reaching a mean IoU/Dice of 0.782/0.870 under oracle selection and 0.737/0.837 under model-score selection. SAM2-Hiera-Large with rectangle prompting followed (0.744/0.848 oracle; 0.699/0.815 model-score), ahead of MedSAM-ViT-Base (0.599/0.737 oracle; 0.387/0.499 model-score). Point prompting yielded consistently low overlap (IoU 0.224–0.319; Dice 0.276–0.414) despite high recall, indicating systematic over-segmentation and large boundary errors. Conclusions: Zero-shot vertebral instance segmentation on raw DICOM spine radiographs is feasible with promptable foundation models when prompts sufficiently constrain target extent. Rectangle prompting is clearly more effective than point prompting in this setting.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alexander Sieradzki
Kamil Koszela
Szymon Koszykowski
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sieradzki et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada885bc08abd80d5bb85b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15052042
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: