Variable geometry ejectors (VGEs) offer passive, compact, and energy-efficient solutions for fluid transport and thermal management in applications such as refrigeration, hydrogen fuel cells, and solar-driven desalination. By adjusting internal geometries, VGEs maintain high performance under off-design and transient conditions, overcoming limitations of fixed-geometry ejectors. This systematic review synthesizes experimental, numerical, and hybrid research on VGEs published between 30 June 1995 and 1 July 2025. Peer-reviewed journal and conference papers were identified through structured searches of Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, followed by PRISMA-guided screening. Forty-eight studies were qualitatively synthesized with respect to modulation mechanisms, actuation and control strategies, working fluids, modeling approaches, validation practices, performance metrics, and Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), complemented by an engineering-specific extension for experimental and numerical studies. Results indicate a strong reliance on numerical modeling, predominantly 2D axisymmetric CFD, with limited high-fidelity experimental validation. Adjustable nozzle throats dominate current designs, while multi-variable geometries and real-time closed-loop control remain underexplored. Most studies cluster at TRLs 2–4, with only two demonstrating full system-level integration. Overall, VGEs show strong potential for energy-efficient operation, but progress toward deployment requires integrated geometry–control co-design, standardized benchmarking, uncertainty-aware validation, and scalable experimental demonstration. This review was not registered.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Masoud Arabbeiki
Mohsen Mansourkiaei
Domenico Ferrero
Energies
Polytechnic University of Turin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Arabbeiki et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada8dfbc08abd80d5bc4e7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051350
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: