In this single-arm, single-center, registrational phase 2 trial, tandem CD19/CD20 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell (TanCAR7) therapy showed promising efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (r/r NHL). Here, we report 5-year follow-up results, including assessments of durable response, survival, and safety. We also investigated risk factors and biomarkers associated with treatment resistance or relapse and evaluated salvage therapies after CAR-T cell failure. Among 87 patients with r/r NHL treated with TanCAR7, the objective response rate was 78% (complete remission rate, 70%) with a median follow-up of 63.4 months. At data cut-off, 40% of patients remained in remission. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with an estimated 5-year OS rate of 60.1% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 33 months. No new or unexpected TanCAR7-related serious adverse events or deaths were observed. High tumor burden and systemic inflammation were risk factors for resistance and relapse. In addition to CAR-T cell expansion in peripheral blood, high levels of endogenous CD8 + T cells and total lymphocytes after infusion correlated with treatment benefit. Salvage chemotherapy post TanCAR7 failure showed limited efficacy, whereas targeted therapy or secondary CAR-T cell therapy achieved clinical responses in a subset of patients. This first-ever 5-year follow-up analysis of a dual-targeted CAR T-cell therapy shows long-term remission potential and no new safety signals in patients with r/r NHL. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03097770.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fuxin Han
Yujue Zhong
Chuan Tong
American Journal of Hematology
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Han et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25b7196eeacc4fceca286 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.70281
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: