Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveTo comprehensively evaluate the clinical and radiological characteristics across intramedullary increased signal intensity (ISI) grades (Grade 0, 1, and 2) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and identify preoperative predictors of ISI severity as well as risk factors for poor postoperative recovery in patients with thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (T-OLF).MethodsA total of 148 patients who underwent posterior laminectomy surgery for T-OLF between January 2017 and August 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, imaging, surgical, and clinical outcome data were collected. ISI grades were independently assessed by three blinded spinal surgeons. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors and risk factors.ResultsHigher ISI grades were associated with worse preoperative neurological status, greater spinal canal compression, more complex OLF morphology, and increased intraoperative blood loss. Multivariate analysis identified a high canal occupying ratio (COR) (Odds ratio OR = 3.20, P = .012) and beak-type configuration on sagittal MRI (OR = 4.24, P = .003) as independent predictors of higher ISI grades. Moreover, multi-segment OLF (OR = 2.23, P = .028) and ISI Grade 2 (OR = 3.67, P = .044) independently predicted poor postoperative recovery.ConclusionPreoperative ISI grade serves as a critical prognostic indicator in T-OLF. High COR and beak-type configuration on sagittal MRI predict severe ISI grades, whereas multi-segment OLF and ISI Grade 2 independently predict poor postoperative outcomes. Incorporating these parameters into preoperative assessment may improve risk stratification, patient counseling, and surgical planning.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Juncai Lei
Panpan Hu
Yanchao Tang
Peking University
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Peking University Third Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lei et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3acd302a1e69014cceded — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261432561
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: