As exploratory learning (EL) is increasingly observed with the use of large language models (LLMs), students demonstrate notably varied levels of engagement and effectiveness when they interact with such LLM-supported learning environments. However, the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities, particularly in how students interact with LLMs, remain underexplored. To address this gap, this observational comparative study systematically investigates the EL strategies of 46 students in two different regions of Asia, classifying 25 distinct strategies across cognitive stages using the Depth of Knowledge model. Our analysis compares strategy usage between high and low-performing student subgroups. The findings reveal: (1) A declining trend in the utilization of EL strategies across ascending cognitive stages. (2) High AWP students employed EL strategies more frequently than their peers, with ten EL strategies exhibiting significant between-group differences. (3) Among students with different AI experience, only a few EL strategies usage and cognitive stages showed significant differences. These insights can help educators and LLM interface designers develop targeted exploratory learning assistance for different types of students and help them build high-level metacognitive processes for effective human–computer interaction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yiming Luo
T. Liu
Patrick Cheong‐Iao Pang
Information
The University of Melbourne
RMIT University
Macao Polytechnic University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Luo et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba42dc4e9516ffd37a37ff — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info17030288
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: