Abstract Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can improve survival in patients with refractory cardiac arrest (CA). However, defining optimal selection criteria for ECPR remains a major challenge. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all ECPR treatments for refractory in-hospital CA (IHCA) and out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) in adult patients from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2024 at our tertiary 35-bed Intensive Care Unit. Before July 2017 (Period 1), ECPR was implemented at physician discretion. From July 2017 (Period 2), a dedicated protocol recommended physicians to implement ECPR based on four criteria: age < 70 years, shockable rhythm, no-flow duration < 5 min, and total low-flow duration < 80 min. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was good neurological outcome at 3 months, defined by a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1 or 2. Results A total of 166 patients (45 in period 1, 121 in period 2), including 80 IHCAs and 86 OHCAs, were included. The proportion of patients fulfilling the 4 criteria was low yet significantly greater in period 2 than in period 1 (35.0 vs. 17.8%, p = 0.027). Hospital survival was improved in period 2 (26.5% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.015), whereas good neurological outcome was not (14.9 vs. 6.7%, p = 0.157). When evaluating the impact of the 4 criteria over the whole study period, patients with 4 criteria vs. those with < 4 criteria displayed marked improvements in survival (48.0 vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001) and good neurological outcome (30.0 vs. 5.2%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, only the simultaneous presence of the 4 criteria was independently associated with a decreased risk of death (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–0.87, p = 0.037), whereas no single criterion alone was significantly predictive. Conclusion Implementing a clinical ECPR protocol in our institutional practice improved meaningful survival in patients with refractory IHCA and OHCA fulfilling four predefined criteria including an age < 70 years, a shockable rhythm, a no-flow < 5 min, and a low-flow < 80 min.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zied Ltaief
Jean Bonnemain
Filip Dulguerov
Journal of Intensive Care
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ltaief et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba42ee4e9516ffd37a3af8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-026-00874-7