Rapid post-disaster building damage assessment requires recognizing explicit structural failures and interpreting implicit situational cues in visually complex scenes. Whereas conventional automated methods are often confined to detecting explicit damage patterns, human perception naturally integrates both types of information into a holistic risk judgment. This study presents an exploratory investigation into the neural signatures underlying this integrated judgment process using electroencephalography. A modified paradigm was employed to probe the cognitive dynamics of risk evaluation in participants with civil engineering backgrounds. Although participants were instructed only to identify damaged buildings without explicit severity grading, event-related potential analysis revealed systematic, graded neural responses that scaled with damage severity. This suggests that the brain encodes damage-related information not as a binary state but as a continuous spectrum of perceived risk, implicitly processing severity, even in the absence of explicit instructions. Furthermore, single-trial analysis demonstrated that time-domain features contain robust discriminative information, verifying the feasibility of decoding these latent judgments from brain activity. These findings provide a physiological basis for developing future cognition-informed algorithms and human-in-the-loop frameworks, bridging the semantic gap to enhance the reliability of automated disaster assessment.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Erqi Zhu
Cheng Yuan
Hong Hao
Buildings
Tongji University
Guangzhou University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhu et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf898bf665edcd009e941b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061237
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: