Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Methods: The study protocol (PROSPERO registry no. CRD42024589621) involved a search of major databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Google Scholar) for studies comparing carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with placebo for the treatment of CSCR. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Effect measures were risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences with 95% CIs for continuous outcomes. Results: The analysis included 225 patients from 7 observational studies, with 133 in the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor group and 92 in the placebo group. No significant change in best-corrected visual acuity was observed in the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor group compared with placebo (mean difference, 0.01 logMAR, 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.11; P = .76). Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors significantly reduced subfoveal choroidal thickness (mean difference, −12.80 µm, 95% CI, −24.66 to −0.94; P = .03) and central macular thickness (mean difference, −52.18 µm, 95% CI, −98.20 to −6.15; P = .03), but no significant differences between groups were observed in incidence of complete resolution of subretinal fluid (RR, 1.45, 95% CI, 0.90-2.36; P = .13) or CSCR recurrence (RR, 0.67, 95% CI, 0.20-2.22; P = .51). Incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor group compared with placebo (RR, 8.75, 95% CI, 1.24-61.79; P = .03). Conclusions: Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors reduce subfoveal choroidal thickness and central macular thickness in CSCR but do not improve visual acuity or achieve complete fluid resolution. In addition, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors pose a higher risk of adverse events, indicating the need for cautious use and further research on their long-term efficacy and safety.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hashem Abu Serhan
Saad Ashraf
Humza Saeed
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Hamad Medical Corporation
Dow University of Health Sciences
King Edward Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Serhan et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37afeb34aaaeb1a67cffb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264261428320